 |
|
IDENTIFYING THE LONG LIST OF OPTIONS
There are thousands of possible permutations of combined estuary
options. So, to develop a manageable ‘long list’ of
options for the Estuary we have used a number of tools, including:
- professional judgement;
- comments received during the previous round of consultation
(Stage 1);
- preliminary estuary modelling including analysis of historical,
current and predicted future changes in the estuary.
As a result we have been able to divide the estuary into upper
and lower ‘sections’ (see Map 1) based on the characteristics
of estuary channel, the flood embankments and the marshes they protect.
The Upper Estuary is characterised by a narrower estuary channel
with flanking mudflat, saltmarsh and flood embankments protecting
relatively small freshwater marshes. The Lower Estuary channel (including
the estuary mouth) is characterised by a wider channel and expansive
mudflats bordered by flood embankments which offer protection to
the extensive and low-lying areas of the Bawdsey, Falkenham and
Felixstowe Marshes. Preliminary analysis has shown that whilst the
individual management options for the Upper Estuary marshes have
little impact on estuary processes, alteration of defences in the
Lower Estuary will have more significant impacts.
Rather than model every possible managed realignment site throughout
the estuary, we have modelled representative marshes from each of
the two sections of the estuary. This allows us to understand how
changes in defence alignment at other sites within these sections
of the estuary might affect estuary processes.
Widening the estuary mouth has also been given consideration in
formulating the long list of options; preliminary analysis of this
option shows that the hard defences on either side of the estuary
mouth provide an essential control point to the processes within
the estuary. Any widening of the mouth would trigger a massive change
in the existing dynamics of the estuary which, amongst other effects,
would result in the loss of the ‘Knolls’. The Knolls
currently reduce water levels within the estuary and feed the down
drift coastline with sediment. For this reason, it is proposed that
widening of the estuary mouth is only considered as part of a No
Active Intervention option, the baseline against which all other
options must be compared.
 |
| Map 1. The Deben Study Area |
The long list of options for the Deben
Estuary
Click here
to see the long list of options developed for the Deben Estuary.
|